Kinetic Solar Energy
Solar energy is the predominant driver of activity at Earth's surface and in its atmosphere. With few exceptions, the energy that:
- creates the temperature differentials that move wind and water currents,
- powers the state changes of water (ice to liquid to water vapor),
- and is manifested in the metabolic processes of the biosphere
- Fossil fuels: Metabolic energy buried in the rock record.
- Flowing water: Energy of the sun-powered hydrologic cycle.
- Wind: Energy of sun-powered air currents.
Big Messages
We address two very different applications of wind power:
- Wind driven locomotion (sailing vessels)
- Wind powered industry (windmills and wind turbines).
- Security: For a society to rely primarily on the wind (for locomotion or industrial power) it must be secure and very well ordered. If it isn't, wind power can only serve as an auxiliary source.
- Future Shock: Major technological innovations of any sort invoke unforeseen consequences.
- Unpredictability: The limiting factor of wind use: Wind power is unpredictable and intermittent.
- Sometimes there is not enough.
- Sometimes there is too much.
Wind powered locomotion
Humans have travelled across water on rafts or boats since near the emergence of the human mind roughly 50,000 years ago. In fact, the peopling of Australia (40,000 years ago) could not have occurred without them, and there is evidence that the New World might have been settled by people arriving in boats. For most of that time, propulsion was strictly by muscle power. The oldest depiction of a wind-powered vessel is from an ancient Egyptian pottery shard from ~3200 BCE (right). The Nile is a logical place for humans to hit upon sailing as a useful technology because while the river has a swift current, prevailing winds blow upstream. Thus:
- To go downstream one need only drift.
- To go upstream one hoists one's sail and sails downwind
- Most of the arable land in Egypt is within a day's walk of the river.
Sailboats are capable of much more than sailing straight downwind. Modern sailing vessels can sail at any angle to the wind greater than ~45 deg provided their hull has some sort of keel to prevent slipping to the side. Indeed:
- A vessel can progress directly to windward by tacking - sequential 45 deg. approaches. (Link to video.)
- Because apparent wind speed increases the faster you move to windward, modern sailing vessels can sail faster to windward than they can downwind (where wind speed is the absolute limit.)
People didn't master these skills overnight, but by historical times, we see complex large vessels capable of transporting goods over long distances. Again, Egypt took the lead. Egypt was not blessed with good shipbuilding materials. Nevertheless, by 1500 BCE, the Egyptians had mastered the construction of ocean-going ships and sailing them to distant destinations in Eritrea, Yemen, and Somalia. Some of these are so well known both from ancient documentation and from a recently unearthed wreck, that an accurate reconstruction, the Min of the Desert, has been built and sailed (right). Soon, the Canaanites, Minoans, Phoenecians, and Greeks were crossing the Mediterranean in sailing vessels. Sailing was independently invented at least four times in:
- Egypt and the Mediterranean
- The Baltic (replica of Roman period Baltic vessel.)
- The Indian Ocean
- East Asia and/or the Pacific
Future shock I - 6th century BCE: Consider that the rise of shipping in the Mediterranean occurred at the end of the "bronze age," however bronze (an alloy of copper and tin) remained an important commodity. At this time, Celtic communities of northern Burgundy became prosperous as middle-men along the trade route between the Mediterranean (source of quality manufactured goods) and Cornwall (southwestern Britain - source of tin for making bronze.) These Celtic towns, situated at transshipment points between rivers flowing into the Mediterranean and the English Channel, cashed in on this trade until the Carthaginians discovered the direct sea route to Cornwall during the fifth century BCE. Thus, the rise of wind-powered shipping drastically altered traditional economies and benefitted societies like Carthage at the centers of shipping networks.
Reconstructions teach us the limits of ancient vessels. Merck's guilty secret: For a time in the 1980s he sailed with the Viking Longship Company, Ltd. aboard the Fyrdraca (right). The Fyrdraca can sail to windward (poorly - maybe 75 degrees from windward) and can tack, but does both slowly and clumsily. Moreover, it requires an absolute minimum crew of four (but really needs six or more for comfort). A similar sized modern boat could normally be sailed by two and can be kitted out for single-handing. Min of the Desert required a crew of 24.
But the big thing: These ancient vessels were always equipped with oar-ports, reflecting the fundamental limitation of wind power in any form:
Wind power is intermittent.
This was not a huge deal for the ancients:- Their societies were not usually run according to tight schedules so mariners could wait for agreeable wind conditions.
- When the wind failed, you could always keep your crew busy pulling on oars. Especially useful in warships where your "cargo" was a bunch of rowdy warriors. (The specialized ramming warships of classical antiquity took this to an extreme, employing a crew of expert rowers to turn their vessels into actual weapons. Link to video.)
- A bigger problem was coping with too much wind. One could sail in strong winds by reefing or tying off part of your sail but this only helped a little. Often, heavy weather simply made navigation impossible.
Security: Although we often distinguish ancient commercial ships and warships, the ancient Mediterranean was crawling with vessels that were a little bit of both (E.G.: "Sea-People" aka Philistine ship, right). This was because any vessel venturing out of home waters was likely to have to defend itself against pirates.
Sailing commerce and security I: By the time of the Roman Empire, Mediterranean society was unified and organized, and greatly depended on large scale shipping not only to power its economy but to sustain its population. The annual arrival of the large (up to 1,200 tons displacement) grain ships (right) from Egypt (an agricultural exporter) was of crucial importance to Italian cities that could no longer feed themselves without imported staples. These ships were far too big to depend on auxiliary oar-power. They absolutely needed:
- Wind - During stormy weather or calms, they could not sail.
- Security - they would have been helpless against pirates.
Roman grain ships had cargo capacities from 350 - 550 tons. Even larger vessels were used in China from Roman times until the 15th century, when Ming Dynasty rulers withdrew China from world commerce. In the West, the political breakdown of the Middle Ages set maritime commerce back as well. Vessels the size of the Roman grain ships only appeared in the 17th century. Whereas Roman grain ships were scaled-up versions of smaller vessels, new Western vessels (as well as Chinese) had modular rigging with multiple masts and sails that was much easier to build and handle. Rather than reefing a single large sail in strong winds, it was possible to vary the number of sails you set. Also, you could rig a ship without felling the largest trees in the forest for spars. These ships were seaworthy enough to make global maritime trade possible for the first time. By the early 19th century, the Atlantic and Pacific were as secure for the major maritime nations as the Mediterranean had been for the Romans.
Future shock II - the fifteenth century and firearms: For warships, the combination of sail and muscle power worked well throughout the Middle Ages. During the 15th century, however, maritime technology met firearms. Canons were devastatingly effective but very heavy. Attempts were made to arm galleys with cannons but such ships were quickly outclassed by adversaries that bristled with guns and couldn't be approached from any direction, even in a dead calm. Navies traded maneuverability for fire-power, producing warships that were as dependent upon the wind as Roman grain ships had been, leading to the world's only navies of competent, purely sail-driven warships between the 15th and 19th centuries. Pure sailing was no longer a choice, and navies had to learn to cope with the vagueries of the wind. During battle, rigging and sailors were terribly vulnerable. As a result, navies longed to reclaim the freedom that auxiliary oar-power had once given them. So, it was no surprise that, when steam engines became available as an auxiliary power source, navies scrambled to use them. By the time of the Civil War, a first rate warship would cruise under sail but fight, or maneuver in port under steam power that turned a propeller. For sea-going commercial vessels that could expect tug-boat service in port and didn't need to be weighed-down by a steam engine, pure sail remained the standard.
Future shock III - the late 19th century: In the mid-19th century, pure steamships were limited in range because of their need for fuel, and were used near the coast and on rivers. Still, the deployment of ironclad steam warships during the Civil War got navies thinking about the desirability of ocean-going steam ironclads.
The problem: Steam warships consumed prodigious amounts of coal and needed frequent resupply. An ironclad steamship of 1870 might cross the Atlantic, but could do little upon arrival until refueled. Alas, as armor and guns became more powerful, warships with sailing rigging were increasingly vulnerable, but switching navies over to steam power would require nations to develop global networks of well defended fueling stations. The HMS Captain 1869 (right) represents the last serious attempt by any navy to build a fully modern sailing warship. Its innovative design separated the gun turrets and rigging on separate decks. Unfortunately its design and construction had been poorly supervised and it was heavier and had a higher center of gravity than planned. It capsized and sank in heavy weather during its first year of operation. This event did for the image of sailing warships what the crash of the Hindenburg did for that of airships. The global powers took the steam plunge and global imperialism went from being an economic convenience to a military necessity.
Power warships and the price of strength: By the 20th century, naval ships (E.G., the HMS Dreadnought - right) were powerful steam-powered steel-hulled monsters. But there was a price for this modernity. Consider: In WWII, the Bismark, one of the most powerful battleships ever built, on its first combat mission, was severely limited in its operational scope and ultimately trapped and destroyed because of its need to reach a friendly port for refueling. Compare that to the CSS Shenandoah, which was operating in the north Pacific when its crew learned of the end of the Civil War, then sailed non-stop and undetected by U.S. authorities to surrender to the British in Liverpool.
Sailing commerce and security II: The switch to steam-powered warships didn't effect sailing commerce. Indeed, the Thomas W Lawson (right), the largest pure sailing vessel in history, was launched in 1902. As in the ancient Mediterranean, however, sail-propelled commerce required security. The breakdown of global security in World War I put an end to such vessels, which were very easy visible targets for steam warships and submarines. In response, freighters became steam or petroleum powered, for rapid passages and in WWII, to keep up with convoys.
To review: Wind powered commercial ships had to deal with the following limitations:
- The wind is an intermittent resource.
- Sometimes you get more wind power than you can use
- For large scale sailing commerce requires secure sea lanes and, hence, the support of a stable and well ordered society.
Windmills: Industrial wind power
If the wind can move vehicles it can also power practical machinery. Ironically, the earliest known use of a windmill was as a novelty: The "windmill" of 1st century CE inventor-mathematician Heron of Alexandria powered a piston-pump supplying air to a pipe organ. The first widespread practical use was in 7th century Iran for milling grain. From there, windmills powered by sails either directly turning a vertical axis or turning a horizontal one that was geared to a vertical axis spread through the eastern Mediterranean to western Europe. In all cases, they were used:
- To mill grain (a task that could also be powered by water-wheels and muscle power.)
- To pump water
But the wind is an intermittent resource. The industrial age provided alternative power sources to grain mills, but for tasks that didn't have to adhere to such exacting schedules, wind mills and wind turbines continued to predominate. The lightweight Aeromotor windmill was introduced in 1888 for pumping water, and is still in production in more or less its original form. Its use is favored, however, in places where electricity is not as readily available.
The wind as a source of electricity: 1888: Within a decade of the Edison's invention of a practical incandescent light bulb and well before widespread electrification, Charles Brush built the first electricity generating wind turbine in Cleveland, OH (right). By the 1930s (i.e. before widespread rural electrification but after electrical appliances were available) Aeromotor-type windmills were frequently used for electricity generation (5-25 kW) 1 kW=1.34 hp). These were largely discontinued when electrification connected farms to reliable power grids. Thus, in their earliest form, wind turbines were in competition with more reliable sources of electrical power.
The Smith-Putnam wind turbine, the first megawatt-sized turbine, was the first wind turbine to contribute to an electirc power grid, being connected to the Vermont grid in 1941.
Modern wind turbines appear in the 1980s: The petroleum supply shocks of the 1970s stimulated interest in alternative energy resources during the pivotal 1980s. Resulting in the development of new wind turbine concepts. While initially small (E.G. the Bonus 30 kW machine at right) these explored a variety of design concepts including upwind facing, downwind facing, and upright turbines. The 1980s saw the development of large modern machines like the Tvind 2 mW device. From this range of designs the modern industry has converged on a preference for upwind-facing three-bladed turbines.
Wind farms: The last two decades have seen the rise of wind farms - large arrays of wind turbines concentrated in regions of high wind energy potential. The earliest, on Crotched Mountain, NH was established in 1980. The largest in the US is currently the Roscoe Wind Farm of Roscoe, TX (right). Wind farms are nice because they neither significantly degrade the land they occupy ecologically nor prevent its having other uses like agriculture. Many wind farms are offshore. A typical wand farm collects electricity generated by individual wind turbines and converts to high voltage current for the local grid.
The US Department of Energy reports that in 2012, wind turbines supplied 32% of US electrical power. As a percentage of installed electrical capacity, however, Denmark and northern Germany lead with wind supplying 25- 50% of power. China is currently investing heavily in wind farms and has the largest overall wind power capacity.
Issues with wind power: Basically similar to those of commercial sail, but with some twists.
- The wind is an intermittent resource: Actually, all energy resources are intermittent because power plants must be shut down for maintenance periodically. Thus, annually:
- Coal plants will be off-line 44 days.
- Nuclear plants will be off-line 36 days.
- Wind farms typically fail to produce power 1-2% of time
- Sometimes we get more wind than we want: Bloomberg News in 2010 reported an interesting development in Northern Germany - negative electricity prices. That's right. Consumers were given rebates for using electricity during periods of peak production. this certainly testifies to the capacity of northern Germany's wind power production, but it's kind of stupid, too. Rather than pay people to burn up energy, we ought to be able to store it effectively. Two hybrid technologies address this:
- Pump storage: During periods of peak production, wind-generated electricity is used to pump water uphill into a reservoir. During slack production, that water is released to create hydroelectric power.
- Compressed air storage: During peak production, electricity is used to pump air into underground reservoirs. At slack times, the air is released to drive turbines for generating electricity.
- Next generation lithium-ion battery storage. Facilitated by advances in battery technology.
- The support of a stable and well ordered society: As a local energy resource, the wind has a poor future because of its unpredictability. Effective use requires regional, state, and national support for:
- Widespread integration of grids: Averaged over large areas, wind power becomes less intermittent. Thus, electric grids capable of moving power over large regions would facilitate its effective use.
- Development of robust grids: As the 2012 Indian blackout and the 2003 Northeast blackout demonstrated, fragile grids can fail in spectacular cascades. A grid that is robust to the kind of failures and surges that caused the 2003 blackout and resistant to national security threats will inherently be able to accommodate the fluctuations of wind energy supply.
- Revising institutional cultures: Engineers trained to manage the grids of the last century have often been reluctant to consider renewable energy resources because of their intermittence. Consider the Xcel utility of Colorado, that fought against a voter initiative to boost renewable energy resource capacity to 10% of output. Having lost, they met the benchmark set by the initiative eight years before schedule and now embrace its goals. Colorado has recently adopted a more ambitious plan to obtain 30% of power from renewables by 2020.
- problems unique to wind power:
- Mortality in flying vertebrates: Wind turbines are absolutely known to kill birds and bats. A study by the National Academy of Science showed that in 2003, 20,000 - 37,000 bird deaths were caused by wind turbines. Compared to the hundreds of millions caused by collisions with skyscrapers and high tension lines, and encounters with cats, this seems trivial but doesn't let wind farms off the hook. Notably, of the deaths cited, all but 9,200 occurred in California, home to some of the oldest wind farms. Facilities like the Altamont Pass Wind Array employ older, high RPM turbines cited along migration routes. More modern machines with slower moving but larger blades and better siting standards can improve the situation.
Bats are typically active during low wind conditions, such that bat mortality could be avoided by shutting wind farms down when they are least effective. Alternatively, bat-repelling acoustics could be identified and incorporated in future wind turbines.
- Noise: Wind turbines have a reputation for noise that is infinitely debated. Modern upwind-facing turbines seem to be very quiet. Obviously different designs have different potential for making noise. How bad is the problem? A recent study by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory study indicates that proximity to wind farms has no impact on property values. How bad can it be?
- Mortality in flying vertebrates: Wind turbines are absolutely known to kill birds and bats. A study by the National Academy of Science showed that in 2003, 20,000 - 37,000 bird deaths were caused by wind turbines. Compared to the hundreds of millions caused by collisions with skyscrapers and high tension lines, and encounters with cats, this seems trivial but doesn't let wind farms off the hook. Notably, of the deaths cited, all but 9,200 occurred in California, home to some of the oldest wind farms. Facilities like the Altamont Pass Wind Array employ older, high RPM turbines cited along migration routes. More modern machines with slower moving but larger blades and better siting standards can improve the situation.
Postscript
A return to sail? For land based power generation, the use of the wind and other "clean" alternatives is growing rapidly. Transportation, however remains dominated by fossil fuels. Can we ever use any alternative power source for moving vehicles and goods in a practical way? Maybe there is a future in high-tech sailing vessels. The problems really are more social than technological. Potential objections:
- Sailing vessels are slow: Never the huge limitation that people imagine, we are today certainly capable of building very fast sailboats, including l'Hydroptere, a sailing hydrofoil with a recorded top speed of 61 kn. (Or for the more modest budget, the International Moth hydrofoil.)
- Sailing vessels need large crews: Time was when these were considered obsolete simply because of the size of the crews needed to handle their rigging. Modern technologies have silenced that objection. The Maltese Falcon (right), a high-tech 88 m sailing yacht capable of sailing at 13 kn requires a crew like that of a similar sized motor yacht. The Maltese Falcon employs a computerized mechanical control system for deploying and furling its square sails.
Cool toys, but are these actually useful? Indirectly, perhaps, as test-beds for potentially practical technologies, like Heron's windmill.
Future Shock IV - 1973: During the 1970s there were times when petroleum really looked like becoming an intermittent resource, also. Along with the development of wind farms, there was serious consideration of commercial sail. The era's poster child: the Shin Aitoku Maru, a small (298 ft.) tanker equipped with computer controlled folding sails that could be used in favorable conditions. Comparisons with a power-only sister ship indicated 10 - 15% reduction in fuel consumption. Not bad. The Shin Aitoku Maru engaged in trials for three years before being retired. There have been no follow-on attempts at a high-tech sailing freighter. What was wrong?
- Oil prices fell during the 1980s.
- Tall masts were found to be impractical in harbors that often feature low bridges.
Many more exotic proposals have been made for the refurbishing of sailing tech. The long and short is that wind power, for the foreseeable future, will be no more than a fuel-efficiency generating auxiliary source for vessels that are fundamentally petroleum powered for as long as:
- Petroleum is available as a practical fuel source
- The world requires shippers to adhere to precise time tables.

