GEOL100
2-2-09
Key concepts
Absolute Dating
Objectives: To present the early history of attempts at absolute dating of rocks, inclding those of John Joly and Lord Kelvin. To outline the discovery of radioactivity and its usefulness in dating. To explain the principles of radiometric dating and the types of rocks in which it can be used.
Early attempts: Initially, three lines of evidence were pursued:
- Hutton attempted to estimate age based on the application of observed rates of sedimentation to the known thickness of the sedimentary rock column, achieving an approximation of 36 million years. This invoked three assumptions:
- Constant rates of sedimentation over time
- Thickness of newly deposited sediments similar to that of resulting sedimentary rocks
- There are no gaps or missing intervals in the rock record.
In fact, each of these is a source of concern. The big problem is with the last assumption. The rock record preserves erosional surfaces that record intervals in which not only is deposition of sediment not occurring, but sediment that was already there (who knows how much) was removed.
|
|
Associated terminology:
- Conformable strata: Strata which were deposited on top of one another without interruption.
- Unconformity: An erosional surface that marks an interval of non-deposition or removal of deposits - a break in the stratigraphic sequence.
- Sequence: Group of conformable layers lying between unconformities.
Unconformities are so common that today, sequence stratigraphy - the mapping and correlation of conformable sequences - is a major field in Geology. With unconformities factored in, the age of the Earth would have to be much greater than 36 million years. Similar attempts varied widely between 3 million and 1.5 billion years.
|
|
Evolution stokes the fire: By the late 19th century, the controversy surrounding evolution prompted new attention. After all, if the Earth were too young for there to have been time for evolution, the evolution debate would be over.
Ocean salinity: In 1889 John Joly, acting on suggestion of Edmund Halley, attempted estimate based on the salinity of the ocean. He calculated the amount of salt being transported into the oceans by rivers and compared this to the salinity of sea water, obtaining an age of 90 million years.
Thermodynamics: Sir William Thomson, Lord Kelvin, during the late 19th century, assumed that the Earth had originally been molten then, using averge melting point of rocks and the laws of thermodynamics, determined that the Earth would completely solidify within 20 million years. Both uniformitarians and evolutionists were uncomfortable, since their notions required an older Earth, but the quantitative rigor of Thomson's approach made his the most prestigeous estimate of his day.
As it developed, both Joly and Kelvin were leaving vital (but unknown) information out of their equations.
- Joly missed that salt is removed from the oceans by various processes.
- Kelvin could not have know that new heat is generated inside the Earth by radioactive decay (nuclear fission), because the process was unknown.
The discovery of radioactivity: Ironically, radioactive decay, which frustrated Kelvin's purpose, ended up providing the true key to the absolute dating of rocks.
- Antoine Becquerel (1852-1908): Discovered natural radioactivity (1896). In the following years, a large number of radioactive isotopes and their daughter products became known.
- Pierre (1859-1906) and Marie (1867-1934) Curie: Discovered that radium continuously releases newly generated heat. With this discovery, it became clear that the decay of radioactive substances provided a continuous source of new heat that Thomson hadn't accounted for. The Earth might, indeed, be much older than anticipated. But how old?
Radiometric dating:
- In 1905, Bertram Boltwood noted a parent-daughter relationship between 235U, a radioactive isotope, and Pb suggesting that one decayed into the other. It develops that each radioactive isotope has a characteristic decay rate, transforming from a parent radioactive substance to a daughter decay product product at a constant stochastic rate. This means that each atom of the radioactive substance has an equal chance of decaying in a given interval. The overall sample, however, displays a constant half life - the amount of time it takes for half of a given sample to decay, regardless of the sample size. Thus, if we know a substance's half-life and can measure the proportions of parent and daughter substances, we can calculate the time at which the crystal containing the substances solidified from a melt.
- Ernest Rutherford calculated decay rate from U to Pb. This enabled the first radiometric dating.
- Arthur Holmes: First used radioactive decay as a means of dating rocks (1911).
Result is that oldest known Earth rocks are aprox 4.2 billion years old (abbreviated "Ga") Oldest in Solar System 4.56 Ga.
|
|
Some commonly used substances:
| Radioactive isotope | Daughter substance | Half Life | Applicable range |
| Uranium 238 | Lead 206 | 4.5 Ga | 10 m.y. to 4.6 Ga |
| Potassium 40 | Argon 40 | 1.3 Ga | 100,000 to 4.6 Ga |
| Carbon 14* | Nitrogen 14 | 5,730 | to 70,000 |
* used in plant material only, not rocks.
Note that the effective range of these dating systems is limited by the degree of error in measurement.
Which rocks are useful? When you radiometrically date a mineral grain you are determining when it crystallized. Thus
- The best rocks to use are igneous rocks in which all crystals are roughly the same age.
- The age of new minerals crystallizing in metamorphic rocks can also be determined by radiometric dating. Because metamorphism can occur over long intervals, they are somewhat less ideal.
Also, we must use minerals that incorporate the radioactive isotope and daughter product in known proportions to begin with.
Thus, sedimentary and metamorphic rocks can't be radiometrically dated. Note: relatively young plant material can be dated with 14C.
Although only igneous rocks can be radiometrically dated, ages of other rock types can be constrained by the ages of igneous rocks with which they are interbedded.
|
|
Magnetostratigraphy
|
The Earth generates a magnetic field that encompasses the entire planet. In the last fifty years, a new dating method has emerged that exploits two aspects of rocks' interactions with the Earth's magnetic field. It is, in essence a form of relative dating. |
|
What kinds of rocks retain paleomagnetism:
Igneous, for reasons noted.
Some sedimentary rocks retain paleomagentism when they contain minerals derived form earlier igneous rocks. Three requirements need to be met:
- Sediments consist of very small grains that settle slowly from water
- Sediments include magnetic minerals
- Sediments were deposited in very quiet body of water, like a lake.
The fact that sediments can record paleomagnetism is very useful. Remember, we have no means of directly measuring the radiometric age of sediments that aren't preserved in association with igneous rocks. We can, however, hang a numerical age on them if their paleomagnetic "fingerprint" can be matched with that of a sequence of igneous rocks that can be radiometrically dated.
By studying paleomagnetic polarity of rocks of different ages, geologists have developed a paleomagnetic time scale that is correlated with the regular time scale. The scale consists of chrons (a.k.a. "epochs" - not to be confused with the epochs of the Cenozoic Era) periods between reversals.
The study of the history of paleomagnetic reversals is called magnetostratigraphy.
The utility of paleomagnetism:
- Radiometric dates are always subject to margins of error, whereas a rock's paleomagnetic polarity is absolute. Knowing the paleomagnetic polarity of a sample can, therefore, give an independent means of constraining its age.
- Most rocks that preserve paleomagnetism (igneous) can also be radiometrically dated. Because some sedimentary rocks can also retain paleomagnetism, then by knowing their polarity, we can assign them more reliable absolute dates by correlating them with igneous rocks of the same paleomagnetic chron.
- Since paleomagnetic chrons are not of the same duration, paleomagnetic time charts resemble sections of tree rings in which the differing thicknesses of adjacent rings provide a "fingerprint" of a time period. Similarly, the differing duration of adjacent chrons gives each period of Earth history a distinct paleomagnetic fingerprint.
Currently, the paleomagnetic record has been worked out through the Triassic.