The Reptilian Stem: Sauropsida, Eureptilia, Diapsida

John Merck

Reptilia or Sauropsida? An issue that haunts us from the early, revolutionary days of cladistics when: Consequently "Reptilia" has at least four phylogenetic definitions in the literature (Modesto and Anderson, 2004.) Respecting priority, GEOL431 goes with the definition of Gauthier et al., 1988 which is:

Given their convictions that:

...this yielded a nice amniote dichotomy between Synapsida and Reptilia. Alas, since then there has been no consensus on the position of turtles, with molecular phylogenies frequently placing them within Diapsida. As hypotheses of phylogeny change, so does the makeup of Reptilia. Worse, in some cases it is redundant with other common group names like "Sauria."

Sauropsida is defined by Laurin and Reisz, 1995 as:

This anchors the definition on Mesosauridae - a basal group yet never appearing on the synapsid side. This makes it both stable and free of cultural association with traditional definitions of "reptiles."


Palatal views of pareiasaurs Deltavjatia and Scutosaurus from the U. C. Berkeley History of Life.

Sauropsida

Sauropsid synapomorphies include:

Among living members we also note:

The basal sauropsid Mesosaurus from Wikipedia.de
Mesosauridae: (Early Permian) Mesosaurus, Braziliosaurus, and Stereosternum. Inhabiting the incipient basin of the South Atlantic, their fossils are from southern South America and Africa. Mesosaur distribution was among the data of Alfred Wegener supporting continental motion. The first amniotes with clear adaptations to aquatic life. Known from many well-preserved specimens, yet phylogenetically enigmatic. Characteristics:

Mesosaur issues:




Milleretta from
University of California Museum of Paleontology

Parareptilia

(Early Permian - Late Triassic or Quaternary, depending) This group has historically included reptilian-grade organisms closer to Eureptilia that did not have living members. The arrival of phylogenetic systematics allowed it to be phylogenetically defined as monophyletic, however its precise membership has been fuzzy because of uncertainties about the position of turtles.

Synapomorphies:


Parareptilian diversity. Although there was a great diversity during the Late Paleozoic and earliest Mesozoic, we focus on two major examples.


Millerina rubidgei from Paleofile
Millerettidae: (Permian) Small (20 - 40 cm.) probably ecological generalists with simple peg-like teeth. Synapomorphies:



Acleistorhinus an ankyramorph, from U. C. Berkeley Museum of Paleontology
Ankyramorpha: (Early Permian - Late Triassic) The more derived parareptiles, including Lanthanosuchoidea, Bolosauridae, Procolophonoidea, and Pareisaauria. Ankyros is Greek for anchor. The name refers to their anchor-shaped interclavicle. Synapomorphies:



Lanthanosuchus from U. C. Berkeley Museum of Paleontology
Lanthanosuchoidea: (Early - Late Permian) Small (20 - 40 cm.) probably ecological generalists with simple peg-like teeth. Contains: Synapomorphies:



Bolosaurus from Wikimedia Commons
Bolosauridae: (Early - Middle Permian) Small (20 - 40 cm.) probably ecological generalists to herbivores with complex teeth. Contains the earliest known facultative biped - Eudibamus cursorius. Although bolosaurids had been known through the 20th century, it was Berman et. al, 2000 who demonstrated their parareptilian nature phylogenetically. Synapomorphies:


Hypsignathus from Stuart Sumida's BIOL622 - California State University San Bernardino
Procolophonoidea: (Late Permian - Late Triassic) Small (20 - 40 cm.) probably ecological generalists to herbivores with bulbous blunt teeth. Typically stocky with short tails, Many members sport cranial ornamentation and armor of dermal scutes. Contains: Synapomorphies: In addition, procolophonoids tend to expand the orbit posteriorly into the temporal region, however in contrast to many more basal parareptiles, there is no temporal fenestration. In most, the cheeks are broadly flaring.



Bashkyroleter mesensis (a) and Macroeter poezicus (b) from Wikipedia.
Nycteroleteridae: (Middle Permian - Late Permian) Small (20 - 40 cm.) Mostly known from skulls, however Emeroleter shows a large skull on a relatively gracile bodies and limbs. These include the parareptiles with the most extensive embayments of the posterior cheek margin and small slender stapes - strongly indicative of impedance-matching ears. Their phylogeny is poorly resolved but Tsuji et al. 2012 find Macroleter to be the most basal. Synapomorphies:



Scutosaurus karpinskii from Mathematical.com
Pareiasauria: (Late Permian). Medium - big, squat, ugly, bumpy. These were major herbivores in the Late Permian world. They competed ecologically with therapsid dicynodonts, and were hunted by therapsid gorgonopsians.

General trends:

Thus, everything points to these creatures having been large, slow moving armored herbivores with extensive digestive systems.

Synapomorphies:


The Early Permian captorhinid Eocaptorhinus laticeps from Paleocritti

Eureptilia

(Late Carboniferous - Quaternary) This group includes Hylonomus lyelli, a Joggins tree-stump victim and the earliest well-known amniote, along with all living diapsids.

Synapomorphies:

Diversity: Diapsida comprises the majority of Eureptilia, but we should note some stem-diapsids.


Diapsida: (Late Carboniferous to Quaternary.) Diapsids re among the first amniotes of the Late Carboniferous, however during the Paleozoic they were a minor component of the terrestrial fauna. That changed during the Mesozoic, when they achieved ecological dominance. Modern diapsids include : Their fossil members have included the largest/scariest land animals ever, however at their root, they were adapted to life as small, fast-moving predators of small prey items.



Petrolacosaurus kansensis from Reisz, 1981
Synapomorphies are visible in Petrolacosaurus (Right - Late Carboniferous) the earliest and among the most primitive diapsids:


Petrolacosaurus kansensis from Reisz, 1981
There are two general patterns here:

Diapsid diversity: Diapsids, as generally conceived, are an apomorphy-based group - the sauropsids that ancestrally possess the diapsid pattern of temporal fenestration, They were among the first groups to be studied with the methods of cladistics (See Gauthier, 1984 and Benton 1985). Remarkably, despite the many naive errors of early cladistics, the membership of Diapsida has not really changed and their general phylogenetic pattern has been stable. Our anchors are: Between them on the saurian stem is an array of fossil stem saurians.


Petrolacosaurus kansensis

Araeoscelidia: (Late Carboniferous - Early Permian). Small slender animals characterized by:

Araeoscelidians are specialized either as arboreal or aquatic animals. Remarkable more for their plesiomorphies, including retention of:

At least one member, Araeoscelis secondarily closes the infratemporal fenestra. The first instance of an interesting pattern: Whereas the supratemporal fenestra is highly conserved among diapsids, the infratemporal fenestra is subject to a wide range of modifications that erode its identity.


Orovenator mayorum (Early Permian) from Reisz et al, 2011
Neodiapsida: (Early Permian - Quaternary) First coined in the 1980s to encompass diapsids closer to Sauria than to Araeoscelidia, its definition has been contentious. The last word belongs to Reisz et al, 2011, who regard it as the last common ancestor of Orovenator mayorum and Sauria and all of its descendants.

Synapomorphies:

We hang all of this on the front 2/3 of the skull roof of a single tiny critter, but that is typical for the study of Paleozoic diapsids, where we must dine on scraps.


Lanthanolania ivakhnenkoi (Middle Permian) from Modesto and Reisz, 2003
Lanthanolania carries the trend forward by: Note: The posterior skull elements are entirely speculative!


Youngina capensis (Late Permian) from Wikipedia
"Younginiformes:" (Late Permian) Our first relatively complete stem-neodiapsid remains belong to this probably paraphyletic group. Members of this grade contain the last diapsids to retain a fully-enclosed infratemporal fenestra, such as Youngina (right). Youngina was terrestral. Others, such as Hovasaurus were aquatic.

Note: It's not clear that all members of this grade had complete lower temporal cheek bars.

Potential synapomorphy of Younginiformes:

Potential synapomorphies of "younginiformes" and Sauria:



Claudiosaurus germaini (Late Permian) from Paleofile
Claudiosaurus: The lower temporal bar is definitely incomplete in Claudiosaurus (right). In life, its place would be occupied by an unossified ligament. Various diapsids would eventually reossify that ligament in various ways, but from this point forward, we deal with diapsids who are descended from creatures whose infratemporal fenestrae have been transformed to broad embayments in the lower margin of their cheeks.

Claudiosaurus was a limb-propelled swimmer with a relatively long neck. When first described it was called a "plesiosaur ancestor." That's probably wrong, but it demonstrates that even in the Permian, diapsids displayed a tendency opportunistically to evolve aquatic forms. They were not, however, marine.


Megalancosaurus preonensis (Late Triassic) from Vertebrate Paleontology at Insubria University
Avicephala (?): (Late Permian - Late Triassic) We glimpse a strange world of specialized arboreal neodiapsids in the form of creatures like:

Monophyletic? Senter, 2004 found these critters and others like them to form a monophyletic group that he called Avicephala. Synapomorphies include:

More recently, Renesto et al. 2010 found Avicephala to be polyphyletic, with the drepanosaurids as members of sauria. Neither hypothesis is crazy, but analyses are very sensitive to taxon selection. We await a truly comprehensive analysis.

Sauria:

(Late Permian - Rec.) The most recent common ancestor of living lizards, Sphenodon, crocodylians, and birds.

Here, for once, in a pleasing cladogram is the arrangement of Gauthier, 1984, in which two crown-groups were recognized in Sauria:

Anchored on these, he defined total-groups that contained them: This setup was embraced so firmly that even though there were technical difficulties with his definition of Lepidosauromorpha, (ask me sometime) most systematists continue to use the term, and so shall we.

Synapomorphies:

Stay tuned.

Additional reading: