GEOL 331: Principles of Paleontology

Fall Semester 2012
Research Paper Information

Guidelines for Paper

Topic: The premise is that you are proposing a paleontological research project. You are not expected to actual conduct this research (as you are unlikely to have access to either the specimens and/or the research equipment necessary to conduct this work).

For this paper, you need to:

Length: Body text approximately 8-10 pp., plus bibliography (necessary), figures, tables, appendices, etc. (if any). Paper must have a descriptive and/or creative title (i.e., don't just call it "Paper" or words to that effect) and must have an abstract (a short, 1-2 paragraph long synopsis of the main points covered in your paper).

Schedule of Paper-Related Assignments:

Grade: Out of 36 points, using the grading rubric at the bottom. Grade on paper incorporates completeness and timeliness of Topic proposal, Intial bibliography, and Abstract, as well as the quality of the final paper itself.

Details on Paper-Related Assignments

References:
The key to research is the ability to document the evidence that support your ideas; if other people don't have a means of double-checking your facts, than they should be skeptical of your conclusions. This is one of the primary reasons for the use of references (the other is to give credit where credit is due).

Not all references are created equal! The emphasis for this (or any other serious college-level paper) should be on primary literature (original work by participants in that field of endeavor), with perhaps some use of secondary literature (reviews or summaries of works of primary literature).

Some forms of reference are entirely unacceptable for this research paper. These include:

Check the bibliographies of the chapters in Introduction to Paleobiology and the Fossil Record for examples of primary literature. (Incidentally, the chapters in both the texts used for this course are perfectly acceptable secondary literature sources!!). Here are some examples of typical primary literature sources you might want to investigate.

Rubric:
FORMAT

TIMELINESS

BACKGROUND, CONTEXT, DEVELOPMENT, AND SUPPORT

  • Exceptional (4 pts): All of the following are present: Detailed background; clear context for the introduction of ideas; ideas are developed rather than merely introduced; factual claims are supported by reference or other data.
  • Good (3 pts): 1-2 cases of the above not being followed.
  • Mediocre (2 pts): 3-4 cases of the above not being followed.
  • Poor (1 pt): 5-8 cases of the above not being followed.
  • Atrocious (0 pts): >8 cases of the above not being followed.

    ORGANIZATION AND TRANSITIONS

    U>QUALITY OF SOURCES

    DETAIL, ANALYSIS, AND INTEGRATION

    ENGLISH GRAMMAR AND SPELLING

    TECHNICAL GRAMMAR

    FACTUAL CONTENT

    BASE GRADE = Sum of each of the 9 categories, from 0-36 pts.

    Additions:

    References and Bibliographic Style:
    In the body text of the review, use the following citation form:

    Although there are variations of reference style you can use (for example, using "and" rather than "&" in lists of names), try and follow the examples below:

    Technical and Grammatical Rules:
    Use the style below, which are the preferred styles for the relevant technical bodies (the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature; the US Geological Survey and International Commission on Stratigraphy; and the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, respectively). Note that not all journal editors are sticklers for these rules, so expect to find cases where improper usage shows up in the readings you do!

  • Taxonomic grammar:

  • Geologic grammar:

  • Chemical grammar:

  • Class Location & Time, Policies, Textbooks, etc.
  • Syllabus & Lecture Notes
  • Handouts
  • References and Links

    Last modified: 9 September 2012