•There are a few groups of primitive ornithischians (such as big-handed, deep-skulled Heterodontosauridae and slender Eocursor that lie outside the rest of Ornithischia
•Thyreophorans represent the armored dinosaurs, and are a clade of (predominantly) quadrupedal ornithischians.
•There are characterized by the presence of osteoderms (armor plates) in their skin. Different clades of thyreophorans express these osteoderms in different patterns.
•Beyond a few basal taxa, thyreophorans are divided into the plated Stegosauria and the tank-like Ankylosauria.
•Armor in thyreophorans seem to have functions beyond simple defense: they served as display structures and (in the case of the stegosaurs and the club-tailed ankylosaurine ankylosaurs) as active weapons.
As we saw in the last lecture, the only likely Triassic ornithischian is Pisanosaurus of the early Late Triassic Argentine Ischigualasto Formation. The fossil is incomplete, so many aspects of its anatomy are uncertain. (We also saw the possibilities that a) this is a silesaurid, not a dinosaur or b) that it is a silesaurid AND a dinosaur!)
Ornithischia is characterized by the following traits:
Based on their tooth form and the retroverted pubis, ornithischians were herbivorous. (That doesn't mean that they were exclusively plant eaters, of course! In the modern world, many "herbivorous" sauropsids and mammals eat some meat.)
Primitive Ornithischian Groups: Heterodontosaurids & Eocursor:
Heterodontosauridae was a primitive group of ornithischians. Although one fragmentary specimen was thought to be from the Late Triassic, redating shows it was younger; the oldest heterodontosaurids are known from Early Jurassic, and persist into the mid-Early Cretaceous. They had skulls which are relatively deep and powerfully built, indicating that they ate fairly tough food. Advanced heterodontosaurids also had premaxillary tooth row that were ventral to the maxillary tooth row and jaw joints that were ventral to the dentary tooth row: the result were jaws that brought the teeth together all at once (like a nutcracker), and not slicing (as in scissors, or as in most dinosaurs). These latter jaw adaptations evolved convergently in Ornithopoda, and so for a long time Heterodontosauridae was considered a clade within Ornithopoda. However, primitive heterodontosaurs lack these convergent adaptations.
Most heterodontosaurids are quite small. Some are only about 1-1.5 m long, and Fruitadens of the Late Jurassic of western North America may have been no more than 80 cm long as an adult (most of which length is tail) and Manidens of the Middle Jurassic of Argentina only 65-75 cm; that makes these the smallest known ornithischians.
Interestingly, the early Late Jurassic Chinese heterodontosaurid Tianyulong had a fuzzy body covering over at least part of its body! If this is found to be homologous to the protofeathers of tetanurine theropod saurischians it would suggest that the concestor of all dinosaurs was fuzzy, and that dinosaurs were thus fuzzy ancestrally! At present, however, there is enough uncertainty to make the homology between Tianyulong's fuzz and tetanurine protofeathers suspicious. (But do not be terribly surprised if in the future we discover that most dinosaurs were fuzzy to some degree or another! All we need is a fuzzy primitive sauropodomorph, and it is basically a done deal!) (By the way, the initial reports placed Tianyulong in the Early Cretaceous, but the formation in which it was found has been redated to the earliest part of the Late Jurassic, around 160 Ma.) (Later, we will see a radical new hypothesis for the position of Heterodontosauridae.)
The similarly aged neornithischian Kulindadromeus of Siberia also shows simple filimentous fuzz, as well as scales, plates, and additional bizarre tufted plates, showing that primitive ornithischians had a wide variety of integumental features.
Once thought to be from the Late Triassic, Eocursor of South Africa is from the earliest Early Jurassic. Of comparable age is the earliest Early Jurassic Laquintasaura. This is the oldest and most primitive ornithischian known from group assemblages, indicating that at least some of these lived in groups during life.
Ornithischians more derived than Heterodontosauridae, Eocursor, and Laquintasaura had greatly reduced hands, losing most of their grasping ability. This suggests a switch to jaws-only while obtaining food.
The remaining ornithischians (Genasauria, the "cheeked reptiles") include the armored Thyreophora and the highly diverse Neornithischia (especially beaked Ornithopoda and ridge-headed Marginocephalia).
MAJOR GROUPS OF THYREOPHORANS
Thyreophora are united by various skeletal attributes, the most obvious of which is:
The derived thyreophorans are the plated Stegosauria (shingled lizards) and the heavily armored Ankylosauria (fused lizards). Both clades are present by the Middle Jurassic. There are several Early Jurassic taxa which fall outside either of the two advanced clades.
Lesothosaurus of the Early Jurassic of southern Africa has sometimes been found to be the oldest and most primitive known thyreophoran in several recent new analyses. If so, it is united with the later thyreophorans on various skeletal traits that are outside the scope of this course. Importantly, it would be the only known unarmored thyreophoran. (But we would expect the oldest ones to have been unarmored.) However, more recent information indicates it is more likely the oldest and most primitive neornithischian or (as shown in the expanded phylogeny above) back to its traditional position as a non-genasaurian ornithischian.
The oldest and most primitive definite (i.e., armored) thyreophoran is Scutellosaurus of the Early Jurassic of western North America. It was a 1.5 m long biped (possibly facultative biped) not very dissimilar to other primitive ornithischians like Lesothosaurus or Hexinlusaurus: small herbivores with small hands. The primary distinction of Scutellosaurus is the presence of a great many small osteoderms over the body. These would protect against small-bodied predators, but might not help against the new larger theropods that had begun to appear in the Early Jurassic.
In response, thyreophorans evolved larger size and heavier armor, as seen in Emausaurus and Scelidosaurus (new specimen shown here), both of Europe. The larger body size (3-4 m long) and proportionately larger osteoderms may have been more effective defense against attacking predators, but forced them onto all fours (at least for Scelidosaurus: in other words, they were obligate quadrupeds.
(Note that the hypothesis shown here is that Scutellosaurus, Emausaurus, and Scelidosaurus were progressive closer to the Stegosauria-Ankylosauria clade (Eurypoda). However, some paleontologists have considered Emausaurus to be a primitive stegosaur, and others that Scelidosaurus was the oldest and most primitive ankylosaur. However, eurypods share a number of transformation not found in these Early Jurassic taxa: these include:
From a Scelidosaurus-like ancestor, the stegosaurs evolved armor that was less covering and more concentrated. While they had some small osteoderms in their skin (particularly around the neck and the hips), most of their armor was specialized as:
In general, the stegosaur armament suggests active defense: the dinosaur probably turned in response to attacking predators, trying to keep the tail towards the theropod so that it could use its thagomizer. Damaged thagomizer spikes and theropod bones with thagomizer-generated puncture wounds confirms their use in defense.
Early stegosaurs were only about 2.5-3 m long, but the most derived forms ranged up to 9 m or more. Their narrow snouts suggests that they were rather picky eaters (that is, instead of munching a lot of plants at once, they were selective as to which ones they chomped.) Biomechanical analysis shows that their bite was stronger than many herbivorous saurischians, but still weaker than many specialized ornithischians. Although they were obligate quadrupeds in terms of locomotion, they may have been able to rear on their hind legs in order to feed higher in trees.
Some tantalizing footprints suggest possible Early Jurassic stegosaurs, but these may be from a more basal Scelidosaurus-like thyreophoran instead. Primitive stegosaurs include Middle Jurassic Isaberrysaura of Argentina (first reported as being an ornithopod, and being Early Jurassic) and Huayangosaurus of China; and Late Jurassic Chungkingosaurus, Gigantspinosaurus and Tuojiangosaurus (all three from China), western North American , Alcovasaurus [figures A, B, E & F], and Early Jurassic Paranthdon of South Africa. More derived stegosaurs form the clade Stegosauridae, and include Middle Jurassic Adratiklit of Morocco, Late Jurassic Dacentrurus and long-necked Miragaia of Europe, Kentrosaurus of eastern Africa, and the Stegosaurinae.
Stegosaurids had dorsoventrally stretched neural arches and disproportionately short forelimbs, giving them an odd profile.
The most derived stegosaurids (Stegosaurinae) lacked shoulder spines (also missing in Tuojiangosaurus), had only plates rather than spikes along the back (again, shared with Tuojiangosaurus), and had alternating rather than parallel plates. This advanced group includes Middle Jurassic Loricatosaurus of Europe, Late Jurassic Jiangjunosaurus of China, the two Late Jurassic western North American genera (Hesperosaurus and famous Stegosaurus [also known from Portugal]), and Early Cretaceous Wuerhosaurus of China, the last of the [distinctive] stegosaurs. (Some stegosaur fragments are known from Europe about the same age as Wuerhosaurus, but are not distinctive enough to place within the stegosaur phylogeny). (Note: some paleontologists consider Wuerhosaurus, and Hesperosaurus to belong within the genus Stegosaurus.)
Stegosaurs are relatively common in Middle and Late Jurassic formations (especially so in China), are present but rare in some Early Cretaceous Asian, African, and European assemblages, and vanish before the end of the Early Cretaceous (at present, Mongolostegus of Mongolia is the youngest known). Claims of later stegosaurs have so far turned out to be either mis-dated or misidentified.
While the stegosaurs evolved active defense, the ankylosaurs (at least at first) seem to have been selected for passive defense: the ability to stay put and absorb damage from an attack. They were even more extensively armored than Scelidosaurus, and were characterized by:
Additionally, in ankylosaurs the predentary bone is reduced, and the jaws arranged so that they would have more extreme rotation (and also be pulled back further) when chewing then in most ornithischians. This evolved convergently (and to a far more extreme form) in the advanced ornithopods. This motion allowed ankylosaurs to more effectively chew up their food.
The oldest ankylosaurs are from the Middle Jurassic: Tianchiasaurus of China, Sarcolestes of Britain, and newly discovered Spicomellus of Morocco. None of these are known from anything approaching a complete skeleton, and it is not inconceivable that one or more of these are actually more basal thyreophorans (in the Scelidosaurus-part of the tree). Alternatively, as mentioned previously, some analyses place Early Jurassic Scelidosaurus as the basalmost ankylosaur rather than a non-eurypod thyreophoran.
Ankylosaur systematics remains contentious. There does seem to be a well-supported clade comprised of Early Cretaceous Sauropelta and Late Cretaceous Edmontonia and Panoplosaurus (all of North America): the Nodosauridae. There is also the well-supported clade Ankylosauridae discussed below. There are a number of other ankylosaurs, however, which are considered by some to be either primitive nodosaurids and ankylosaurids; and/or to lie outside a nodosaurid-ankylosaurid clade; and/or to form their own clade Polacanthidae. The latest published study places such forms as either basal nodosaurids or basal ankylosaurids, or just outside both. The oldest ankylosaur (Middle-Late Jurassic Tianchiasaurus of China) was not included in this study and may represent an ankylosaur outside the Nodosauridae-Ankylosauridae clade. All ankylosaurs in that study were other closer to Ankylosaurus than to Nodosaurus (and thus members of Ankylosauridae) or closer to Nodosaurus than to Ankylosaurus (and thus members of Nodosauridae). (As a warning for the future, however: a conference presentation found a phylogeny where all non-ankylosaurid ankylosaurs formed a paraphyletic series relative to Ankylosauridae. If this is supported in future work, "Nodosauridae" as we know it will vanish.)
In the study followed here, Late Jurassic North American Mymoorapelta and Gargoyleosaurus, and Early Cretaceous Gastonia of North America and Polacanthus of Europe are among the most primitive nodosaurids. Sauropelta and later Cretaceous forms seem to form a clade. Advanced nodosaurids are united by a large muscle attachment projection on the scapula and often have a tall laterally-directed shoulder spine. In addition to the North American taxa listed above, nodosaurids include many additional Cretaceous North American taxa such as Animantarx and spectacularly-preserved Borealopelta, as well as radiation of primarily European forms such as Europelta of the Early Cretaceous and Struthiosaurus of the Late Cretaceous. Nodosaurids range from about 3-7 m in length. They are known (as shown above) from Europe, North America, and Asia; there are possible nodosaurid bones from other regions (including Antarctopelta from Antarctica and an unnamed form from Argentina).
Early Cretaceous Kunbarasaurus of Australia seems to be the most primitive known ankylosaurid, with Hylaeosaurus (the first discovered thyreophoran) slightly more derived. Another primitive ankylosaurid is tiny Liaoningosaurus of China (to be fair, all known specimens are from juveniles, so we don't know how big it got.) Ankylosaurids have distally-stiffened tails
In the more derived clade Ankylosaurinae there are extremely complex air chambers in the skull (convergently evolved with Gastonia)
Additionally, ankylosaurines are further transformed relative to other armored dinosaurs in having:
Ankylosaurines are only known from the late Early Cretaceous of Asia and the Late Cretaceous of Asia and western North America at present; similar distributions are known for various other dinosaurs, as we shall see.
Ankylosaurids are more than their armor! Recent work has demonstrated that the bones which control the tongue and throat are incredibly well-developed in these dinosaurs: far more so than all other dinosaurs (outside of some birds.) They almost certainly have long, powerful tongues: possibly for insect eating, possibly for grabbing plants, and possible for both and more.
EVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS IN THYREOPHORA
Probably the most conspicuous aspect of their evolution. Thyreophorans begin with a set of small scutes; develop larger scutes at the expense of bipedalism (and speed); then split between specialists in active (Stegosauria) vs. passive (Ankylosauria) defenses. Within the ankylosaurs, though, Ankylosaurinae independently evolves an active defensive tail weapon.
Stegosaurs and ankylosaurs, as sister taxa, have their origins at the same time. However, stegosaurs flourish first (in the Middle and Late Jurassic), only to peter out during the Early Cretaceous and disappear before its end. Ankylosaurs are typically rare in the Jurassic (although at one location Gargoyleosaurus is very common), but become abundant in the Cretaceous.
Narrow-snouted basal thyreophorans and stegosaurs differ from broader-snouted ankylosaurs. The latter have a greatly reduced predentary bone, which may have allowed for more complex motion of the dentaries (for additional munching power) while feeding. The powerful tongue of ankylosaurids hint at some specialized form of feeding.
Thyreophorans are only rarely found in mass death assemblages, and so (unlike some sauropods, ornithopods, and marginocephalians) probably did not live in large groups.
The spikes, plates, and osteoderms of thyreophorans almost certainly had a defensive function. But many are very broad (particularly stegosaur plates), and the patterns tend to be specific to each species. They may have served an additional function: as visual displays of species recognition. There may also have been a sexual display function to them, but at present it is uncertain if the variation we see in some thyreophorans is from sexual dimorphism or if it is from multiple species of the same genus living together.